If you have any interest crossing the line between your more technical experiences and policy/government at all, you'll likely find yourself wanting to set up meetings with the offices of elected officials who represent you or sponsor bills related to your work. I don't know about you, but this isn't something I was formally taught in classes (if you were, please email me so I can take that course). I've put together these general points to guide your early experiences.
This advice is pretty general to any situation you might find yourself as a technical person acting in a policy space. I hope they will give you a sense of what you're walking in to if it's your first time, and serve as a convenient reminder if it isn't. You shouldn't try to do this all yourself, reach out to your institution's governmental affairs office and ask them to help you plan everything out. This planning should include strong consideration for the time it takes to get from building to building and through the metal detectors. Before you make your way to DC, work to schedule meetings with legislator’s offices from 3 important areas:
Your districts (including school, and any places you’ve lived before).
Influential committees in the House and Senate (House/Senate Energy and Natural Resources, Senate Environment and Public Works—subcommittee on clean air and climate).
Legislators who have introduced/sponsored nuclear bills you care about (probably going to be the same as committee people in the house, may not be the same in the senate).
The last thing I'll say before we get into the actual points is on the metro, you should absolutely take advantage of the public transportation in the city. If you don’t have a metro card, you should pick one up from the first metro station you see--you’re going to want to have access to the metro and buses. You can also add this card to your phone’s wallet pretty easily for mobilepay. You can find a pretty easy map on the WMATA website that can guide you, but honestly your maps app is your friend. Remember to have enough on your card to enter and exit the station, because you need to scan your card/phone as you enter and exit.
1. Expectation Setting
You should start by asking the people you're meeting with what their time restrictions are. From a member, you’ll get maybe 15 minutes, staffers will probably get 30 minutes. Be on time (5 minutes early where possible), expect them to take a minute or two to be ready. Don’t chew gum, and have fun with them (be the happy nuclear warrior).
2. Knowing Your Audience
Do a quick Wikipedia search for connections, checkout the staffers if you can too. Use the title of the bill and the H.R. or S. number, unless you’re sure they’ll know it already from your research into them. Some questions to write up answers before you go:
Have they sponsored or cosponsored any of the bills you want to talk about?
What is the energy mix of the state?
Do they have any nuclear plants, facilities, hubs, or companies in their district?
What committees do they sit on?
Have they done anything with education or educational programs?
Where’d they go to school?
3. Getting to Your Asks
The staffer won’t be able to give you a yes or no if they haven’t signed on to a bill, but you can ask them to consider it. You should front load your specific policy asks, and add context and explanation as you go along. These asks should be somewhat tailored to each representative (it’s not possible for someone from the senate to vote on house bills, but you can encourage them to support it in their body). Speaking of which, you should always check to see if there are both house and senate versions of a bill and what their differences are.
4. Communicating Your Ideas
Focus on policy, not politics. Don’t assume anything because of their party, especially on energy. If the congressperson is on the relevant committee you can do greater detail, but otherwise start with the policy and get into what it would translate to in the real-world. If you sense you’ve lost them, take a breath and ask them a question.
Try not to use acronyms. Treat them like adults, not experts (these are very sharp individuals, they'll be able to pick up your message pretty quickly).
4.1 Accuracy vs Precision
In STEM courses we are encouraged to focus on being precise with our words---in my abstract blog, I say that you should limit adverbs for this very reason. When you communicate technical content, we need to value accuracy. Focusing on accuracy first, you will not lose your audience or distract yourself from the real reason you're there by equivocating and qualifying in real time.
I think the analogy that communicates this clearly is a dartboard (I certainly didn't come up with this, and I have no idea who did). If you have low accuracy but high precision, the darts will be near each other but not near the bullseye. If you have high accuracy and low precision, the darts will all be centered around the bullseye. In an ideal situation, you can be both highly accurate and highly precise, but, when you have 30 minutes with someone who is responsible for energy, security, environment, housing, and k-12 schooling policy (this was a real staffer I met with), you need to get to the point and help them do their job working for you.
5. Sharing what you've Heard
You may have heard from other governmental organizations, some of them may have shared personal opinions with you, you don’t speak for them and they don’t officially have opinions about funding. If there’s something you want to bring up, find the receipts online and bring it up in the context of your concerns about it. This means that, if you are getting to meet with organizations, come in with questions and take notes.
6. Analogies Enhance Memorability
I work in fuel cycles, so when I’m explaining what that is to people I often talk about making bread (milling flour, bagging ingredients, shipping to the bakery, and distributing to people all make good analogies to nuclear). Some other things you might consider including are size comparisons (e.g., building a conventional LWR can be like building an airport).
Think about how these analogies tie in to your accurate policy communication, and ask yourself it is really adding value. You have limited time, so don't spend it with a confusing or off-topic analogy.
7. Followups
It’s important to have a follow up. An easy one is to send the electronic version of the policy statement. To check the progress of bills, get updates from the gov website. Touch base not more than 2 weeks later. Articles, interviews, and questions you said you'd answer later are good followups as well. If you weren’t able to get meetings with specific representatives, you can always try to followup with a zoom meeting in the following weeks.
